口腔疾病防治 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 737–739.doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2017.11.012

• 防治实践 • 上一篇    下一篇

硫辛酸治疗灼口综合征的临床效果

魏平杰(), 王小禾   

  1. 新疆医科大学第二附属医院口腔科,新疆 乌鲁木齐(830000)
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-12 修回日期:2017-06-06 出版日期:2017-11-20 发布日期:2018-09-03
  • 作者简介:

    【作者简介】 龙明生,副主任医师,硕士, Email:517070542@qq.com

Clinical effect of lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome

Pingjie WEI(), Xiaohe WANG   

  1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical Univerisity, Department of Stomatology, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2017-05-12 Revised:2017-06-06 Online:2017-11-20 Published:2018-09-03

摘要:

目的 探讨硫辛酸治疗灼口综合征的临床疗效。方法 收集灼口综合征患者29例,分为2组,硫辛酸组14例,采用硫辛酸治疗;常规组15例,采用谷维素、维生素B2、维生素E。对比观察2组治疗前后疼痛改善程度,监测治疗过程药物不良反应发生情况。结果 治疗前,硫辛酸组与常规组2组VAS评分差异无统计学意义(t=1.05,P>0.05)。治疗第1周,两组VAS评分横向比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.09,P>0.05);治疗第2周,2组VAS评分差异有统计学意义(t=4.23,P<0.05);治疗第3周,2组VAS 评分差异有统计学意义(t=3.97,P<0.05)。硫辛酸组治疗第1周(t=3.25,P<0.05)、2周(t=3.33,P<0.05)、第3周(t=4.27,P<0.05)VAS评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义。常规组治疗第1周(t=2.93,P<0.05)、2周(t=3.71,P<0.05)、第3周(t=5.11,P<0.05)VAS评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义。治疗过程中未监测到药物不良反应。结论 硫辛酸可能具有缓解灼口综合征患者口腔黏膜疼痛的疗效。

关键词: 硫辛酸, 灼口综合征, 疗效, 疼痛, 维生素

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effects of lipoic acid in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome. Methods From May 2015 to May 2016, patients with burning mouth syndrome were selected and divided into experimental group (n=14) and control group (n=15). Patients were treated with lipoic acid in the experiment group while oryzanol, vitamin B2 and vitamin were given in the control group. The pain degrees in two groups were compared before and after treatment, and the adverse drug reaction were monitored during the process. Results Before and after 1 week treatment, there was no statistical difference between VAS scores in two groups (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences after 2 or 3 weeks (P < 0.05). Improvement of VAS score was found in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). No adverse drug reaction was found during the treatment. Conclusion Lipoic acid can relieve the pain of patients with burning mouth syndrome.

Key words: Alpha-lipoic acid, Burning mouth syndrome, The treatment effect, Pain, Vitamin

中图分类号: 

  • R781.5

表1

2组治疗前后VAS评分比较"

组别 治疗前 治疗第1周 治疗第2周 治疗第3周 t1 P1 t2 P2 t3 P3
硫辛酸组(n=14) 6.09 ± 1.35 4.97 ± 1.64 4.11 ± 1.56 2.97 ± 1.78 3.25 <0.05 3.33 <0.05 4.27 <0.05
常规组(n=15) 5.91 ± 1.55 5.07 ± 2.81 4.79 ± 2.45 3.77 ± 1.15 2.93 <0.05 3.71 <0.05 5.11 <0.05
t 1.05 0.09 4.23 3.97
P >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 <0.05
[1] HirokoI, masahiko S, YokoY, et al. Characteristic changes of saliva and taste in burning mouth syndrome patients[J]. J Oral Pathol Med, 2016, 45(3): 231-236.
[2] 周先略, 唐祎, 徐靳, 等. 星状神经节阻滞治疗难治性灼口综合征临床观察[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2008, 24(8): 501-502.
[3] Palacios-Sánchez B, Moreno-López LA, Cerero-Lapiedra R, et al.Alpha lipoic acid efficacy in burning mouth syndrome: a controlled clinical trial[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2015, 20(4): e435-e440.
[4] 蔡涛. 药物联合心理疏导治疗灼口综合征的疗效观察[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2017, 21(10): 1194-1195.
[5] 郭春岚, 赵继志, 张洁. 低强度激光治疗原发型灼口综合征的疗效评价[J]. 中国激光医学杂志, 2014 (3): 141-144.
[6] 李秉琦. 实用口腔黏膜病学[M] . 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 2011: 227-233.
[7] 韦武亭, 王汉东, 吴永, 等. α-硫辛酸在小鼠创伤性脑损伤中抗神经细胞凋亡的作用[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2015, 28(6): 574-578.
[8] 秦欣. α-硫辛酸对糖尿病大鼠肠道痛觉敏感性的影响及其分子机制的研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2015: 1-33.
[9] 代青芸, 崔鸢, 冯慧, 等. 灼口综合征的病因及发病机制[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2015, 42(1): 54-58.
[10] Tatullo M, Marrelli M, Scacco S, et al.Relationship between oxidative stress and "burning mouth syndrome" in female patients: a scientific hypothesis[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2012, 16(9): 1218-1221.
[11] 唐果, 张蕾, 曹秀堂. α-硫辛酸治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的Meta分析[J]. 中国药物应用与监测, 2012, 9(1): 12-15.
[12] Vallianou V, Evangelopoulow A, F'avlos K, et al.Alpha-Lipoic acidand diabetic neuropathy[J]. Rev Diabe Stu, 2009, 6(4): 230-236.
[13] Patel N, Mishra V, Patel P, et al.A study of the use of carbamazepine, pregabalin and alpha lipoic acid in patients of diabetic neuropathy[J]. J Diabetes Metab Disord, 2014, 27(13): 62.
[14] 杨映阳, 吕宗凯, 杜胜男. 灼口综合征300例临床分析[J]. 医学综述, 2014, 20(14): 2687-2688.
[15] 崔丹, 张英. 低能量激光治疗灼口综合征疗效研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2017, 10(3): 158-162.
[16] Dillenburg CS, Almeida LO, Martins MD, et al.Laser phototherapy triggers the production of reactive Oxygen species in oral epithelial cells without inducing DNA damage[J]. J Biomed Opt, 2014, 19(4): 048002.
[1] 李嘉,单兆臣,宋燕敏,王雅菊,葛文章,汤炜. 髁突骨折不同治疗方式的选择及疗效分析[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(9): 569-573.
[2] 雷先会, 杨森. 康复新液联合地塞米松治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的临床疗效[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(6): 384-386.
[3] 何柃锟, 熊伟. P2X 受体在口腔颌面部疼痛中的作用研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(4): 254-257.
[4] 于习习, 吕健, 王彩霞, 王艺衡, 邓松松, 李璐璐, 王万春. 维生素B1 与B12 肌肉注射对灼口综合征患者疼痛、唾液及味觉的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(4): 240-244.
[5] 王超, 赖仁发. 缓解正畸疼痛方法的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2018, 26(2): 133-136.
[6] 夏慧贞, 钱园园. 中药膏方治疗复发性口腔溃疡的临床效果观察[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(9): 605-607.
[7] 郑翼, 赵转浓, 王艺羲, 曹阳, 刘楚峰. 正畸力作用下大鼠前扣带皮质层中信号转导与转录激活因子1 的表达变化[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(8): 482-487.
[8] 谢跃伶, 刘楚峰. 微种植支抗钉加镍钛拉簧压低伸长磨牙的临床研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(4): 231-234.
[9] 王庆琳, 周少云, 何永坚, 马明玉, 李荣霞. PAR 指数及头影测量评价拔除下颌第一磨牙的矫治效果[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(12): 788-793.
[10] 张华. 种植修复治疗慢性牙周炎牙列缺损的短期疗效[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(10): 652-655.
[11] 闫艳梅, 贺涛, 马灿灿, 郑品轩, 刘琪. 维生素D对牙周炎的影响[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2016, 24(2): 114-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!